The decision is workflow depth, not another score
A visibility dashboard is useful when a team already has analysts who can interpret share-of-voice trends and turn them into work. Prefometry is designed for a different job: show a small team where a competitor is repeatedly recommended, preserve the answer and source evidence, explain the gap, and create a bounded action that can be owned and rechecked.
Both approaches observe volatile model outputs. Neither can guarantee a future recommendation. The practical difference is what happens after a gap is found and how much of the evidence chain remains available to the operator.
What Prefometry adds
Each opportunity keeps Opportunity Score separate from Evidence Confidence. Score answers whether the work may be valuable and actionable. Confidence answers how much repeated, multi-source evidence supports the observation. A single answer can remain visible without being presented as a stable fact.
- Raw provider response fingerprints and exact citation URLs
- Why competitors win, with observed source and page evidence
- Versioned Action Packs with an owner, due date, approval, and completion state
- Comparable 7, 14, and 30 day rechecks using the same prompt conditions
When a dashboard may be the better fit
Choose a broad dashboard when your priority is executive benchmarking across hundreds of prompts, many markets, or a large enterprise portfolio and you already have a delivery process elsewhere. Choose Prefometry when a smaller team needs the evidence and next action in the same system. The free scan is the safest way to test that fit with your own domain.