Scoring guide

Evidence Confidence is not Opportunity Score

Why a valuable opportunity can be uncertain, and why a recurring observation can still be low priority.

Reviewed 2026-08-11

Two questions require two measures

Opportunity Score asks whether closing a gap appears commercially useful and feasible. Evidence Confidence asks whether the observed gap is supported by enough repeated, fresh, accessible evidence. Combining them into one number makes a high-value but uncertain observation look more certain than it is.

High score, low confidence

A critical purchase question may show a large competitor gap in one sample. The value is obvious, but the evidence is isolated. The safest action is another run or another source—not immediately rewriting the site around one answer.

High confidence, low score

A competitor may repeatedly appear for a broad informational question that has little purchase intent or no practical action. The pattern can be real without deserving scarce content or outreach time. Recurrence should not override business value.

Use the pair as a decision rule

Prioritize high-score, medium-or-high-confidence work. Sample high-score, low-confidence gaps again. Monitor low-score patterns without turning them into tasks. Always keep the underlying response and source evidence available so an operator can challenge the measures.

Apply this method to your domain

Run a free scan to turn the method into a real list of missed recommendations, source evidence, and next actions.

Run the evidence check